![]() ![]() The cost for a single machine setup is about equal. Eg, if he updates from mythtv 0.22 to 0.23 on the server, then he also needs to update the client, as the client/server protocol is not compatible between versions.Īll in all, I'd say the advantages for SageTV are:ģ) ease of setting up things like comskip, metadata, fan art, etcġ) more features (like timestrech playback)Ģ) much more reliable recording than I've had from SageTV If the OP's friend is going to run a client/server setup, then he has to be aware that he needs to do updates to the client/server in lockstep. For me, the reason to use SageTV was the HD extenders. I also used MythTV for a few years before switching to SageTV. Honestly, I think the preferred client these days is a linux box with an Nvidia VDPAU video card. I guess there's something to be said for the forced stability of a extender. For me, that was my downfall as the WAF took a serious nose dive during my "geeked out fiddle sessions". Myth is great if you like to customize and fiddle as just about any configuration is possible. I really got tired of dealing with codecs and video driver issues on the client side. I used MythTV for several years before switching to SageTV primarily due to the extenders. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |